Theoretical understanding of deep learning is one of the most important tasks facing the statistics and machine learning communities. While deep neural networks (DNNs) originated as engineering methods and models of biological networks in neuroscience and psychology, they have quickly become a centerpiece of the machine learning toolbox. Unfortunately, DNN adoption powered by recent successes combined with the open-source nature of the machine learning community, has outpaced our theoretical understanding. We cannot reliably identify when and why DNNs will make mistakes. In some applications like text translation these mistakes may be comical and provide for fun fodder in research talks, a single error can be very costly in tasks like medical imaging. As we utilize DNNs in increasingly sensitive applications, a better understanding of their properties is thus imperative. Recent advances in DNN theory are numerous and include many different sources of intuition, such as learning theory, sparse signal analysis, physics, chemistry, and psychology. An interesting pattern begins to emerge in the breadth of possible interpretations. The seemingly limitless approaches are mostly constrained by the lens with which the mathematical operations are viewed. Ultimately, the interpretation of DNNs appears to mimic a type of Rorschach test — a psychological test wherein subjects interpret a series of seemingly ambiguous ink-blots. Validation for DNN theory requires a convergence of the literature. We must distinguish between universal results that are invariant to the analysis perspective and those that are specific to a particular network configuration. Simultaneously we must deal with the fact that many standard statistical tools for quantifying generalization or empirically assessing important network features are difficult to apply to DNNs. Interpreting Deep Learning: The Machine Learning Rorschach Test

Jeremy Achin and Tom de Godoy are both data scientists turned entrepreneurs.

Tools for Working with Excel and Python

The recent successes of AI have captured the wildest imagination of both the scientific communities and the general public. Robotics and AI amplify human potentials, increase productivity and are moving from simple reasoning towards human-like cognitive abilities. Current AI technologies are used in a set area of applications, ranging from healthcare, manufacturing, transport, energy, to financial services, banking, advertising, management consulting and government agencies. The global AI market is around 260 billion USD in 2016 and it is estimated to exceed 3 trillion by 2024. To understand the impact of AI, it is important to draw lessons from it’s past successes and failures and this white paper provides a comprehensive explanation of the evolution of AI, its current status and future directions. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics

The Dataiku Data Science Roadshow is *on - *17 cities, 12 countries, and countless data scientists and pizzas. This September, we decided to take our successful meetup series (traditionally held in either New York and London) one step further to connect even more of the data community across the world.

Someone just sent me a link to an editorial by Ken Church, in the journal Natural Language Engineering (who knew that journal was still going? I’d have thought open access would’ve killed it). The abstract of Church’s column says of China,

Tools for Statistical Content Analysis (tosca)A framework for statistical analysis in content analysis. In addition to a pipeline for preprocessing text corpora and linking to the latent Dirichlet …

Starting with the idea that sentiment analysis models should be able to predict not only positive or negative but also other psychological states of a person, we implement a sentiment analysis model to investigate the relationship between the model and emotional state. We first examine psychological measurements of 64 participants and ask them to write a book report about a story. After that, we train our sentiment analysis model using crawled movie review data. We finally evaluate participants’ writings, using the pretrained model as a concept of transfer learning. The result shows that sentiment analysis model performs good at predicting a score, but the score does not have any correlation with human’s self-checked sentiment. Psychological State in Text: A Limitation of Sentiment Analysis

Bandit algorithms for real-time data capture on large social medias